Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

You must login to ask a question.

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Share & grow the world's knowledge!

We want to connect the people who have knowledge to the people who need it, to bring together people with different perspectives so they can understand each other better, and to empower everyone to share their knowledge.

William runs a company that hauls toxic chemicals between factories. William is in compliance with all safety and environmental laws

Question

William runs a company that hauls toxic chemicals between factories. William is in compliance with all safety and environmental laws, but one tanker truck is in an accident and spills chemicals into a creek, which requires costly cleaning. William

a. is liable only if it acted negligently.
b. is strictly liable for all harms.
c. is not liable because the driver should have taken extra care in such a situation.
d. is not liable if it acted with due diligence to see that no one was hurt.

Answer:

b. is strictly liable for all harms.

Explanation:

Strict liability for all harms.” The principle of strict liability means that a person or company is held responsible for their actions regardless of fault or negligence. However, the specific circumstances of the spill and its consequences are crucial in determining liability.

In this case, the statement “William is in compliance with all safety and environmental laws” is important. If William has taken all necessary precautions, followed safety regulations, and met environmental standards, he might not be strictly liable for the spill. Strict liability often comes into play when inherently dangerous activities are involved, but compliance with laws and regulations can be a defense against strict liability.

The correct answer depends on the legal principles applied in the jurisdiction and the specific details of the accident. Generally, strict liability may apply in cases involving hazardous materials, but if William has exercised due diligence, followed regulations, and the spill occurred despite these efforts, the liability may be mitigated.

It’s important to consult legal experts or refer to specific laws and regulations in the jurisdiction in question to determine the liability in such a scenario.

Related Posts

Leave a comment

Latest News & Updates

QuizlyPro Latest Articles

McMann Solutions Inc. knowingly violates the Clean Water Act by discharging hazardous pollutants into a nearby river

McMann Solutions, Inc., knowingly violates the Clean Water Act by discharging hazardous pollutants into a nearby river. McMann Solutions is subject to a. neither a fine or imprisonment. b. fines but no criminal charges or imprisonment because a corporation cannot ...

Farm and Ranch Supply Co. discovers a cache of an unknown herbicide in a back corner of its warehouse

Farm and Ranch Supply Co. discovers a cache of an unknown herbicide in a back corner of its warehouse. Farm and Ranch repackages the product, relabeling it as “Farmer’s Friend” and stating on the label and in advertisements that it ...

Tiger Stripe owns and operates gasoline filling stations. Patrick’s Trucking delivers fuel to Tiger Stripe’s storage facility on a regular basis

Tiger Stripe owns and operates gasoline filling stations. Patrick’s Trucking delivers fuel to Tiger Stripe’s storage facility on a regular basis. On one occasion, Patrick fails to pay proper attention to his truck when he is unloading fuel into Tiger ...

Explore Our Blog